[Phpug] IPUG constitution and other formalities.

[Nev Farrell]

I think that a presence should be expressed but not just a physical one.
Due to time constraints, lack of transport, and an even bigger lack of
knowledge, I would not be attending meetings, but I am moreso a listener. I
think active participation through discussion or attendance would be a good
thing to have, but telling people they have to be there could be a small bit
OTT in my opinion.

Regards,
Nev.


-----Original Message-----
From: phpug-bounces at lists.iephpug.org
[mailto:phpug-bounces at lists.iephpug.org] On Behalf Of Michele Neylon
Sent: 30 July 2008 19:29
To: Irish PHP User Group
Subject: Re: [Phpug] IPUG constitution and other formalities.

Ken Guest wrote:
>  Now as far as AGMs are concerned, I think a physical presence should be
> required
> partying^Wconference/community building exercises could follow on
> afterwards.
> It'd give people a chance to get to know each other and network after the
> business has concluded.
> 

I don't see why a physical presence should be required. Desired - sure, 
but required?